Despite Their Legal and Media Backing, HYBE Struggles to Convince the Court

{ Also, when the court asked, “The creditor (Min Hee-jin) said that she must reveal that she was not the reason for his dismissal, do I have to prove that ‘I did nothing wrong?’” Hybe responded, “Proof of non-existence is usually more difficult than proof of existence, but He also replied, “I hope the right to be preserved is explained in good faith,” and “I think the burden of proving (non-existence) lies with the creditor.” The court will receive additional materials from both sides by the 24th. A decision will be made before the general meeting of shareholders on the 31st. revealed. Hive's voting rights will be restricted due to the injunction. Will the injunction be dismissed and the dismissal process for CEO Min proceed? It is noteworthy. However, the investigative agency regarding CEO Min's alleged breach of trust As this investigation is ongoing, the merits of the case will be decided instead of citing or dismissing the preliminary injunction. The possibility of it leading to a lawsuit cannot be ruled out. in this case The extraordinary shareholders' meeting scheduled for the 31st will become virtually meaningless. It is a prospect.}


"So HYBE is telling Min Hee-jin to prove that she’s innocent.
Is this for real??? lol

+ The judge got annoyed with HYBE for bringing up shamanism and told them to stop lol"

{But the court was cautious. When Hybe side argued as if exposing many cases, claiming shamanic management and gender sensitivity issues as reasons why Representative Min could not maintain her position as representative, the court tried to block the case, saying, “Speak about legal principles, not shamans.”}

THE COMMENTS:

1. How are they supposed to prove they didn’t do it? Has HYBE gone crazy?
2. They should just provide evidence if they claim they did it. This is ridiculous.
3. What is this.........
4. Come at us directly instead of using the media, hiding behind idols you created, spreading rumors through gossip sites, and now asking the other party to prove their innocence after filing a lawsuit. What are they even doing? They're getting everything done for them.
5. Comment deleted.
6. This reminds me of the drama "Pinocchio." How do you prove you didn't do something?
7. They must be desperate if they're acting like this even on weekends. Are they crazy?
8. Provide a detailed explanation... haha
9. Reminds me of that "Infinite Challenge" courtroom meme.
10. What are they saying?
11. This is the lawsuit Min Hee-jin filed against HYBE, not the other way around.
12. Gender sensitivity, my ass. They just make female characters with bouncing breasts.
13. You need to prove you did something, not that you didn't. What? Even if Min Hee-jin filed the lawsuit, typically the burden of proof lies with the accuser. If claiming innocence, you need to refute the evidence or accusations made against you. Asking someone to prove they didn’t do something is just wordplay.
14. Lol, even lawyers must feel terrible knowing they have to spout this nonsense just because they're getting paid.
15. Ridiculous.
16. But is that legally possible? How can the accused be required to prove their innocence? Does that even make legal sense?
17. The judge must be really annoyed having to listen to this nonsense.
18. Truly pathetic.
19. Isn't this like that "Infinite Challenge" episode about crime and punishment?
20. The judge must be thinking, “Is this really a big company?”
21. HYBE keeps pushing the media narrative despite the bad public opinion because they really have no evidence...
22. This is just like the Nissan-Renault case, where the Japanese Ministry of Justice asked them to prove their innocence.
23. ☞22 HYBE accused Min Hee-jin of breach of trust, aiming to dismiss her at the May 31st shareholders' meeting. Min Hee-jin filed an injunction to prohibit the HYBE board from exercising their voting rights based on these non-existent breach of trust allegations. Since the core issue of the injunction is the "breach of trust allegations," HYBE should provide evidence for these allegations.
24. As a current legal professional, I can confirm that the responsibility to prove grounds for dismissal lies with the disciplinary authority (HYBE). Of course, the accused has to refute it as well.
25. HYBE is really hopeless.
26. The burden of proof for dismissal lies with HYBE, the accuser, lol. HYBE is hopeless...
27. Comment deleted.
28. They got caught doing the same things they did in the gaming industry. In gaming, they would create a fuss about embezzlement, shake things up, and the person would resign voluntarily. But this time, the protagonist is Min Hee-jin, and they didn’t expect it to get this far. HYBE seems to have nothing in their hand.
29. How can you prove you didn’t do something? They should already know if they have all the forensic data from KakaoTalk.
30. What kind of nonsense logic is this? Are they gangsters?
31. Reminds me of the drama "Pinocchio."
32. Why are they acting like this?
33. What are they saying?
34. Aren’t they idiots? Lol, they’re acting like this because they have no evidence.
35. When people who don’t even know what “preservation of evidence” means discuss things, the conclusion gets weird.
36. If they have plenty of evidence, why don’t they just reveal it?
37. If they make everyone else do the work, what is HYBE even doing?
38. Even the judge must be dumbfounded.
39. They must really have nothing.
40. After all this fuss...
41. Even there, they’re asking for proof that you didn’t do it. It’s ridiculous. ㅠ ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
42. Provide evidence of guilt, come on lol
43. Evidence that it didn’t happen..?
44. The side claiming guilt should provide evidence, what lol
45. So arrogant, are they really pulling this nonsense in court?
46. This is so annoying..
47. How much evidence do they lack to act like this lol
48. They're real thugs.
49. Why is Kim & Chang so famous? They seem useless.
50. ☞49 Even if they lose, they get paid. They’re top in fees, not in win rate lol
51. ☞49 They're famous because they win cases through connections domestically. Against foreign companies, they’re useless.
52. Talking about gender sensitivity? With that reasoning, they should all be fired. Crazy pigs.
53. Kim & Chang takes any case if there's money, huh? lol
54. It seems they can’t prove the breach of trust. Today’s media antics are proof.
55. They claimed they had definite proof of breach of trust, but now they’re like this lol It’s pathetic.
56. They’re just saying anything now. The court must be so fed up.
57. Proving you didn’t do something lolololol
58. Absolutely hopeless.
59. By their logic, can't we just sue Bang Si-hyuk for embezzlement? Since they have to prove they didn’t do it lol
60. Isn’t this country based on the presumption of innocence? Shouldn’t the accuser provide evidence for the guilt?
61. HYBE is so pathetic.
62. So they really have no evidence.
63. They claimed they had solid evidence and made a big deal out of it. Now they’re asking Min Hee-jin to prove she didn’t do it?
64. After all that media play claiming they did it, now they want Min Hee-jin to prove she didn’t?
65. The judge must be extremely annoyed...
66. This is hilarious.
67. HYBE should provide the evidence. What are they even doing?
68. So they did all this media play without evidence.
69. You can feel the judge’s frustration lol
70. Bang World is really something.
71. Those idiots at HYBE.
72. They expect game companies to prove they're not feminists; if they can't, they're fired. It's not surprising.
73. Dumb HYBE.
74. This is why I hate talking to idiots. You can’t have a decent conversation with them. Education doesn’t matter. But they just keep laughing.
75. Isn’t it a basic principle of law that the claimant provides the proof?
76. This is really pathetic.
77. Do we have to prove non-existence now? Is that how the law works?
78. The judge must be really pissed.
79. The court is questioning HYBE back, this is hilarious.
80. What nonsense is this.. Prove innocence? Didn’t they claim they had all the evidence of guilt? lolol
81. ☞80 They just want her to clarify.
82. Prove non-existence? Is HYBE philosophizing in court? The judge must be the most frustrated. lol
83. What nonsense.
84. Separate from this case, I thought the civil law requires the side claiming invalidity to present evidence. Is that correct?
85. HYBE must have made the judge tired ㅜ
86. How do you prove non-existence? lol
87. Is this really Kim & Chang? They seem so stupid lol
88. This reminds me of the drama Pinocchio. How do you prove innocence without knowing what crime you're accused of? lolol
89. They used complex words but basically admitted they have no evidence.
90. Prove you didn’t do it, lol
91. You committed breach of trust! Anyway, you did, right? You say you didn't? Prove it. Ridiculous.
92. The side claiming it happened should provide the evidence.
93. How can a famous law firm make such a blatant logical error? Didn’t they study logic? Do they need to bring a unicorn to prove unicorns don’t exist?
94. I don't know~ Prove your innocence~ lolol
95. They’re blatantly shifting the burden of proof lolol Sejong will win again.
96. I don't care, just do it.
97. Why are they acting like this?
98. HYBE talking about gender sensitivity? Aren’t all their executives old men?
99. They used difficult words, but essentially it means they want her to prove it lol
100. Isn’t the principle of presumed innocence that the accuser must prove guilt?
101. This is a mess. How can someone prove they didn’t do something, for fuck's sake?
102. Asking her to prove her innocence lol Are they crazy?
103. They’re just saying random things while getting paid.
104. Presumption of guilt, wow.
105. Even the judge doesn’t understand it lol
106. Where did they sell the principle of presumption of innocence?
107. They’re just going "I don't care" lol
108. Shouldn't HYBE be the one to prove the reason for dismissal?
109. This is a mess.
110. Aren't they supposed to be Kim & Chang… This is too much. Even as a legal layman, I can tell this is bullshit.

ORIGINAL POST HERE